You are currently browsing the LaMaster’s Corner weblog archives for the day 20. October 2009.
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Sep | Nov » | |||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
| 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
| 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
| 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | |
- Arizona (37)
- Cheney (18)
- Constitution (20)
- Corporations (66)
- Culture (98)
- Current Events (137)
- Deficit (51)
- Economy (109)
- Education (16)
- Energy (15)
- Environment (27)
- Fracking (1)
- George W. Bush (9)
- Government (138)
- Guns (18)
- Health care (42)
- Homelessness (5)
- Immigration (20)
- Labor (27)
- Media (54)
- Medicare (23)
- Military (21)
- Politics (203)
- President Obama (72)
- Privatization (6)
- Religion (26)
- Social Security (22)
- Sports (2)
- Supreme Court (6)
- Taxes (53)
- Tea Party (95)
- Teapublicans (111)
- Terrorism (24)
- Tibet (2)
- Uncategorized (1)
- Voter Suppression (4)
- War (28)
- 26. January 2012: The Civil War 2.0.
- 25. January 2012: Patriots? Or Idiots?
- 22. January 2012: Newt = John Edwards To The Nth Degree.
- 20. January 2012: Masters Of The Double Standard.
- 19. January 2012: Raising Cain.
- 9. January 2012: The Wisdom Of Iowa.
- 5. January 2012: Lies, Damn Lies and Teapublican Lies.
- 29. December 2011: The Great Right Hopes?
- 27. December 2011: The Know-Nothing Network.
- 23. December 2011: Presidential Backstabbing.
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
Archive for 20. October 2009
Let the investigations begin.
20. October 2009 by admin.
It was recently announced that a former member of the Bush cabinet, Gail Norton, is the subject of a corruption probe. As Secretary of State, Ms. Norton awarded some lucrative oil shale leases to a subsidiary of Royal Dutch Shell PLC, the company that hired her a few months later.
The focus of the investigation is whether Norton violated a law that prohibits federal employees from discussing employment with a company if they are involved in dealings that could benefit the firm. It’s also possible that she broke the federal “denial of honest services” law, which permits a government official to be prosecuted for violating the public trust.
I have no idea if Ms. Norton is guilty. Her actions certainly give the appearance of guilt. But she’s certainly not the only former member of the Bush administration who appeared guilty of some impropriety.
How about former EPA chief Stephen Johnson who found ways to avoid regulating greenhouse gases? How about former Secretary of Treasury Henry Paulson who authorized billions to former colleagues in financial institutions without restrictions? How about former Attorney General Alberto Gonzales who fired US attorneys for what appeared to be political purposes? Or how about John Yoo who found questionable justification to approve torture? Scooter Libby was convicted of outing a covert CIA operative, but what about those above him who likely encouraged him to release the information?
How about Don Rumsfeld who was responsible for awarding “no bid” military contracts to the corporation that was previously headed by former Vice-President Cheney? Finally, how about the former president who usurped power from Congress and seemingly ginned up information to justify an unwarranted invasion of Iraq?
As long as there are reasonable suspicions that these people committed illegal or unethical actions, there is a great likelihood that this kind of unethical behavior will continue.
And why limit the investigations to former government officials? The Bush administration was especially egregious. But the problems with our government go much deeper.
While we’re at it, let’s investigate the links between all elected officials and lobbyists. After all, when a political candidate receives tens of thousands of dollars from an industry, corporation, lobbyist or individual expecting special access or treatment, is that not as unethical as what Gail Norton is accused of?
Posted in Military, Energy, Teapublicans, War, Constitution, Environment, Government, Politics, Cheney | Print | No Comments »