You are currently browsing the LaMaster’s Corner weblog archives for the day 25. November 2009.
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Oct | Dec » | |||||
| 1 | ||||||
| 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
| 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
| 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 |
| 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | ||||||
- Arizona (37)
- Cheney (18)
- Constitution (20)
- Corporations (66)
- Culture (98)
- Current Events (137)
- Deficit (51)
- Economy (109)
- Education (16)
- Energy (15)
- Environment (27)
- Fracking (1)
- George W. Bush (9)
- Government (138)
- Guns (18)
- Health care (42)
- Homelessness (5)
- Immigration (20)
- Labor (27)
- Media (54)
- Medicare (23)
- Military (21)
- Politics (203)
- President Obama (72)
- Privatization (6)
- Religion (26)
- Social Security (22)
- Sports (2)
- Supreme Court (6)
- Taxes (53)
- Tea Party (95)
- Teapublicans (111)
- Terrorism (24)
- Tibet (2)
- Uncategorized (1)
- Voter Suppression (4)
- War (28)
- 26. January 2012: The Civil War 2.0.
- 25. January 2012: Patriots? Or Idiots?
- 22. January 2012: Newt = John Edwards To The Nth Degree.
- 20. January 2012: Masters Of The Double Standard.
- 19. January 2012: Raising Cain.
- 9. January 2012: The Wisdom Of Iowa.
- 5. January 2012: Lies, Damn Lies and Teapublican Lies.
- 29. December 2011: The Great Right Hopes?
- 27. December 2011: The Know-Nothing Network.
- 23. December 2011: Presidential Backstabbing.
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
Archive for 25. November 2009
Who’s really at fault for our nation’s predicament?
25. November 2009 by admin.
Who is more at fault for the problems that face our nation? Republican candidates? Or the voters who are deceived into voting for them? During campaigns, Republican candidates take a populist tone. They talk about the issues that are important to ordinary Americans such as opportunity and personal freedom. But when they are elected, they tend to focus almost exclusively on issues designed to benefit the elite.
Despite promises of fiscal responsibility, Reagan and George W. Bush dramatically increase the deficit and national debt. Despite promises of small government, Bush created the huge bureaucracy that is Homeland Defense. And the Republican mantra of lower taxes has really proven to be nonsense. They may occasionally offer a token tax cut for the middle and lower class, but the real cuts are reserved for the wealthy. Republicans talk about creating jobs then make it easier for corporations to eliminate collective bargaining and ship jobs oversees. They talk about getting government regulations out of the way then watch corporations create new scams to abscond with more of their consumers’ money.
Why, then, do voters fall for these false promises over and over? Often it’s because they aren’t curious enough to really examine the party’s platform and hold the candidates accountable. And all too often it’s because they focus on a variety of wedge issues such as abortion, terrorism and same-sex marriage. They fall victim to a sort of 3 card monte. They’re mesmorized by the Republican distractions of fear, anger and religion.
How many lower and middle class voters actually benefited from Reaganomics? How many benefited from George W. Bush’s “compassionate conservatism?” I submit that instead of jobs, increased salaries and tax cuts, they were rewarded for their votes with war, massive deficits and decreased prosperity. But the real Republican constituency consisting of CEOs, bankers, investors, oil executives and defense contractors is doing just fine, thank you.
Posted in Current Events, War, Tea Party, Teapublicans, Corporations, Culture, Government, Politics, Deficit, Taxes, Economy | Print | No Comments »