You are currently browsing the LaMaster’s Corner weblog archives for the day 26. May 2010.
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Apr | Jun » | |||||
| 1 | 2 | |||||
| 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
| 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |
| 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 |
| 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 |
| 31 | ||||||
- Arizona (37)
- Cheney (18)
- Constitution (20)
- Corporations (66)
- Culture (98)
- Current Events (137)
- Deficit (51)
- Economy (109)
- Education (16)
- Energy (15)
- Environment (27)
- Fracking (1)
- George W. Bush (9)
- Government (138)
- Guns (18)
- Health care (42)
- Homelessness (5)
- Immigration (20)
- Labor (27)
- Media (54)
- Medicare (23)
- Military (21)
- Politics (203)
- President Obama (72)
- Privatization (6)
- Religion (26)
- Social Security (22)
- Sports (2)
- Supreme Court (6)
- Taxes (53)
- Tea Party (95)
- Teapublicans (111)
- Terrorism (24)
- Tibet (2)
- Uncategorized (1)
- Voter Suppression (4)
- War (28)
- 26. January 2012: The Civil War 2.0.
- 25. January 2012: Patriots? Or Idiots?
- 22. January 2012: Newt = John Edwards To The Nth Degree.
- 20. January 2012: Masters Of The Double Standard.
- 19. January 2012: Raising Cain.
- 9. January 2012: The Wisdom Of Iowa.
- 5. January 2012: Lies, Damn Lies and Teapublican Lies.
- 29. December 2011: The Great Right Hopes?
- 27. December 2011: The Know-Nothing Network.
- 23. December 2011: Presidential Backstabbing.
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
Archive for 26. May 2010
Corporate “Citizens”
26. May 2010 by admin.
Anyone who has ever founded a corporation knows that the entity exists only on paper. It’s a legal agreement between the shareholders and the government. Incorporation is designed to encourage the creation of jobs by offering legal protection to the shareholders in the event the corporation defaults on its financial liabilities. That’s it. It’s a legal “veil” of financial protection. Yet the current Supreme Court has disregarded long-established legal precedents to give corporations the same rights as individuals with regard to freedom of speech.
For the Court to make this ruling, it had to re-write the Consitution in two regards. One is that, according to the Court, money is now the equivalent of free speech. Two is that corporations are equal to individual citizens. If protecting a woman’s right to make decisions with respect to her own body is evidence of “activist” justices, what do these rulings represent? Super activism?
But now that conservatives on the Court have created this quagmire, I suggest they take it a step farther.
Why not rule that corporate “citizens” are subject to the same criminal codes as individuals? After all, aren’t conservatives always reminding us that rights must be accompanied by responsibilities?
So if a young male is sentenced to 5-10 years for robbing a convenience store, why shouldn’t the CEO of a corporate giant get at least that many years if that corporation defrauds millions from customers? If an undocumented immigrant is jailed and deported when found working in a meat-packing house, doesn’t it stand to reason that the corporation’s CEO be subject to penalties, including jail time, for hiring that immigrant? If a teenager is imprisoned for vandalizing public property, why shouldn’t BP executives get a prison sentence for causing the Gulf catastrophe?
Wouldn’t it be satisfying to see BP executives (and their government regulators) handcuffed and forced to do a perp walk in front of the national media? And once they’ve been imprisoned, maybe we should put them on a diet of water and seafood from the Gulf.
Posted in Current Events, Energy, Corporations, Constitution, Politics, Environment | Print | 1 Comment »