You are currently browsing the LaMaster’s Corner weblog archives for the day 20. January 2012.
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Dec | Feb » | |||||
| 1 | ||||||
| 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
| 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
| 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 |
| 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | |||||
- Arizona (38)
- Cheney (18)
- Constitution (21)
- Corporations (67)
- Culture (101)
- Current Events (140)
- Deficit (51)
- Economy (110)
- Education (17)
- Energy (16)
- Environment (28)
- Fracking (1)
- George W. Bush (9)
- Government (142)
- Guns (19)
- Health care (45)
- Homelessness (5)
- Immigration (20)
- Labor (28)
- Media (54)
- Medicare (24)
- Military (22)
- Politics (208)
- President Obama (73)
- Privatization (6)
- Religion (29)
- Social Security (23)
- Sports (2)
- Supreme Court (6)
- Taxes (54)
- Tea Party (95)
- Teapublicans (114)
- Terrorism (24)
- Tibet (2)
- Uncategorized (1)
- Voter Suppression (4)
- War (29)
- 22. February 2012: Tell Teapublicans To Shove It.
- 20. February 2012: Arizona: A Nice Place To Visit, But You Probably Don’t Want To Live Here.
- 15. February 2012: Separation Clause Doesn't Apply To Contraceptive Mandate.
- 13. February 2012: Ending "Drive-By" Politics.
- 6. February 2012: A True Conservative.
- 26. January 2012: The Civil War 2.0.
- 25. January 2012: Patriots? Or Idiots?
- 22. January 2012: Newt = John Edwards To The Nth Degree.
- 20. January 2012: Masters Of The Double Standard.
- 19. January 2012: Raising Cain.
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
Archive for 20. January 2012
Masters Of The Double Standard.
20. January 2012 by admin.
The field of Teapublican “presidential” (and I use the term loosely) candidates have proven, once and for all, that Teapublicans are almost completely devoid of ethics. I’d call them hypocrites, but we’re talking about Teapublicans here, so, for their benefit, I’ll try to use small words.
Teapublicans famously fight for so-called family values, yet many support Newt Gingrich who is twice divorced and whose second wife stated that Newt demanded an “open” marriage. In other words, a marriage that would allow him to boink anyone he wanted. So much for the “sanctity” of marriage issue.
Gingrich also admitted to 84 ethics violations while Speaker of the House and resigned in disgrace. Most of these violations were the result of Newt gaming the system to enrich himself. So much for the anti-Washington, anti-corruption issue.
Turning to the front-runner, Teapublicans are furious with so-called “Obamacare.” But what did President Obama use as a model for his health care reform? Why “Romneycare,” of course. You simply can’t be against the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and support Mitt Romney. So much for the government health care issue.
Romney is also a “Vulture Capitalist” (Newt’s words, not mine) who led a private equity firm that purchased undervalued corporations with other peoples’ money, saddled the corporations with large management fees then sold off their assests while laying off thousands of American workers. So much for the jobs issue.
In addition, Romney has admitted to “parking” large amounts of money in off-shore bank accounts to avoid paying taxes. And though he has not yet released his tax returns, he estimates that his tax rate is “somewhere in the area of 15 percent.” Given that Mitt is a multi-millionaire, that’s a nice area to be in, especially considering that much of the middle class is taxed at a rate of 30-35 perecent! And, if Romney is elected and allowed to institute his recommended tax policies, his tax rate will dramatically drop while the tax rate for the middle class will remain virtually unchanged. And the tax rate for the poor will actually go up! Moreover, Romney’s tax plan will add tens of billions of dollars to the deficit. So much for the deficit and debt issues.
Voter support for these two only shows that Teapublicans are not really for anything. They’re simply against Obama. And many of them don’t even know why.
Posted in Current Events, Religion, Teapublicans, President Obama, Taxes, Deficit, Labor, Politics | Print | No Comments »